- 讲师:刘萍萍 / 谢楠
- 课时:160h
- 价格 4580 元
特色双名师解密新课程高频考点,送国家电网教材讲义,助力一次通关
配套通关班送国网在线题库一套
甲企业是一家生产型企业,为进行风险管理,该企业对采购审批制度进行了调 查分析。调查过程中,将采购审批的每一个步骤确定为一个模块,在每个模块中标示出各种潜在的风险因素,从而进行定性分析。该企业采用的风险管理技术与方法属于( )。(第六章 风险与风险管理)
A. 风险评估系图法
B. 流程图分析法
C.敏感性分析法
D.事件树分析法
甲公司是一家钢铁企业,近期准备新建一生产线项目,考虑项目实施过程中一些不确定性因素的变化,该公司分别将固定资产投资、经营成本、销售收入这三个因素 作为分析对象,分析每一个因素的变化对该项目内部收益率的影响。根据以上信息可以 判断,该投资方采取的分析方法是( )。(第六章 风险与风险管理)
A.敏感性分析
B.决策树
C. 情景设计
D. 事件树分析法
下列风险管理技术与方法中,能够对风险进行定量分析的是( )。(第六章 风险与风险管理)
A.专家意见法
B.事件树分析法
C.流程图分析法
D.风险评估系图法
下列各项中,属于国际反避税措施的有( )。
A.防止通过纳税主体国际转移进行国际避税
B.防止通过纳税客体实现国际转移进行国际避税
C.防止利用避税地避税
D.加强税收多边合作
E.利用资本弱化避税
下列申请人从中国取得的所得为股息时,可不根据规定的因素进行综合分析,直接判定申请人具有“受益所有人”身份的有( )。
A.缔约对方政府
B.缔约对方居民且在缔约对方上市的公司
C.缔约对方居民个人
D.申请人被缔约对方政府直接持有100%股份
E.申请人被缔约对方居民直接持有95%股份
下列各项中,符合印花税有关规定的有( )。
A.已贴用的印花税票,不得揭下重用
B.对技术开发合同,以合同所载的报酬金额和研究开发经费作为计税依据
C.纳税人签订的应税合同不论是否兑现或是否按期兑现,均应贴花
D.在应纳税凭证上未贴印花税票的,由税务机关处以2000元以下的罚款
E.在应纳税凭证上未贴印花税票的,处不缴或少缴税款50%~5倍罚款
下列权利许可证照,应征收印花税的有( )。
A.房屋产权证
B.土地使用证
C.商标注册证
D.会计师事务所执业许可证
E.工商营业执照
In relation to corporate behaviour and legal liabilities:
(a) explain the doctrine of independent legal entity of a company;
(b) state the system of disregard of corporate personality;
(c) state the liabilities of a shareholder for abusing the doctrine of independent legal entity of a company.
Mr Ding picked up a handbag lost by somebody when he was walking in the park. There was lots of cash, some bills of exchange and a set of commercial documents in the handbag. Mr Ding found, from the information on the documents, the owner of this handbag was Ms Liang and contacted her.
On the day, as fixed by Mr Ding and Ms Liang via exchange of communications, Ms Liang went to Mr Ding’s home to take back the handbag. Before handing over the handbag to Ms Liang, however, Mr Ding requested a sum of cash as a reward for his kindness and efforts to return the lost handbag. Ms Liang refused to give the reward.
Required:
Answer the following questions in accordance with the Property Law, and give your reasons for your answer:
(a) state whether Mr Ding was entitled to request a reward for returning the lost handbag;
(b) if Ms Liang had put up an advertisement offering a reward for the successful find of the lost property, state whether she could refuse to grant the reward if she learnt that Mr Ding did not see the advertisement;
(c) assuming Mr Ding could not find the owner and turned the handbag over to the police who then published an announcement of finding of the lost property in the newspaper, state how to deal with the handbag where nobody claimed it.
Shenhua Company Ltd (Shenhua) has been buying products from Kangyi Chemicals Company (Kangyi Chemicals) for more than one year. By the end of 2013, the two parties negotiated to settle the previous business transactions and confirmed that Shenhua owed an outstanding amount of RMB 800,000 yuan to Kangyi Chemicals.
Several days later, Shenhua entered into an agreement with its holding company, namely Shenhua Holdings, to transfer all its debts of RMB 800,000 yuan due. In doing so, Shenhua neither notified Kangyi Chemicals, nor got a consent from Kangyi Chemicals.
Having discovered this information, Kangyi Chemicals sent an email to Shenhua Holdings to inquire whether Shenhua’s debts had been transferred to Shenhua Holdings. Shenhua Holdings acknowledged the transfer but did not promise to settle the debts as a new debtor.
Kangyi Chemicals filed a lawsuit against Shenhua Holdings for the unsettled RMB 800,000 yuan. Shenhua Holdings submitted the following defences: First, the transfer agreement between Shenhua and Shenhua Holdings was an invalid one as Shenhua failed to get prior consent, as required by the law, from Kangyi Chemicals before the completion of transfer. Second, the goods delivered by Kangyi Chemicals in the last six months contained material defects which caused loss and damage to Shenhua as the original counterparty.
Required:
Answer the following questions in accordance with the Contract Law, and give your reasons for your answers:
(a) state whether the transfer agreement between Shenhua and Shenhua Holdings was a valid one;
(b) state whether Shenhua Holdings was entitled to submit its defence on the ground of the defects in the goods
delivered by Kangyi Chemicals to Shenhua.
根据《合同法》的规定,下列关于合同解除的表述中,正确的有( )。
A. 租赁物危及承租人安全的,无论承租人订立合同时是否知道租赁物质量不合格,承租人都可以随时解除合同
B. 承揽合同的定作人可以随时解除承揽合同
C. 不定期租赁的出租方可以随时解除租赁合同
D. 不定期租赁的承租方可以随时解除租赁合同
课程专业名称 |
讲师 |
课时 |
查看课程 |
---|
课程专业名称 |
讲师 |
课时 |
查看课程 |
---|
点击加载更多评论>>