解放军文职招聘考试Peace in the Atomic Age

 Peace in the Atomic Age

I am grateful to you for the opportunity to express my conviction in this most important political question.

The idea of achieving security through national ar­mament is, at the present state of military technique, a disastrous illusion. On the part of the United States this illusion has been particularly fostered by the fact that this country succeeded first in producing an atomic bomb. The belief seemed to prevail that in the end it were possible to achieve decisive military superiority.

In this way, any potential opponent would be in­timidated, and security, so ardently desired by all of us, brought to us and all of humanity. The maxim which we have been following during these last five years has been, in short, security through superior mil­itary power, whatever the cost.

The armament race between the U. S. A. and U. S. S. R., originally supposed to be a preventive meas­ure, assumes hysterical character. On both sides, the means to mass destruction are perfected with feverish haste—behind the respective walls of secrecy. The H-bomb appears on the public horizon as a probably at tainable goal.

If successful, radioactive poisoning of the atmos­phere and hence annihilation of any life on earth has been brought within the range of technical possibilities. The ghostlike character of this development lies in its apparently compulsory trend. Every step appears as the unavoidable consequence of the preceding one. In the end, it beckons more and more clearly general annihi­lation.

Is there any way out of this impasse created by man himself? All of us, and particularly those who are responsible for the attitude of the U. S. and the U. S. S. R. , should realize that we may have vanquished an external enemy, but have been incapable of getting rid of the mentality created by the war.

It is impossible to achieve peace as long as every single action is taken with a possible future conflict in view. The leading point of view of all political action should therefore be: What can we do to bring about a peaceful co-existence and even loyal cooperation of the nations?

The first problem is to do away with mutual fear and distrust. Solemn renunciation of violence (not only with respect to means of mass destruction) is undoubt­edly necessary.

Such renunciation, however, can only be effective if at the same time a supra-national judicial and execu­tive body is set up, empowered to decide questions of immediate concern to the security of the nations. Even a declaration of the nations to collaborate loyally in the realization of such a " restricted world government" would considerably reduce the imminent danger of war.

In the last analysis, every kind of peaceful coop­eration among men is primarily based on mutual trust and only secondly on institutions such as courts of jus­tice and police. This holds for nations as well as for in­dividuals. And the basis of trust is loyal give and take.